Tobacco Farming
This page was last edited on at
Key points
- Tobacco farming is promoted as profitable and a good source of revenue for governments, but it often traps farmers and workers in poverty, debt, and exploitative labour conditions.
- Child labour remains prevalent in tobacco farming.
- Farmers and their communities face serious health risks, including nicotine poisoning, pesticide exposure, and respiratory diseases.
- Tobacco cultivation damages the environment through pesticide use and deforestation.
- Climate change is making tobacco growing even more financially risky for farmers.
- Tobacco companies use CSR/ESG initiatives to improve their image, while obstructing genuine efforts to support farmers with sustainable alternatives.
Background
Article 17 of the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) encourages parties to promote sustainable alternatives to tobacco farming.1
Decreasing tobacco consumption from 2000 to 2020 was reflected in a worldwide decline in tobacco leaf production during the same period.23 However, tobacco remains a widely grown cash crop for many farmers, especially in low- and middle- income countries (LMICs), where the vast majority of tobacco farming now takes place.45 90% of tobacco is now grown in LMICs including Bangladesh, Indonesia, Malawi, Kenya, and Zambia.3678
The tobacco industry portrays tobacco farming as economically advantageous for governments and farmers. Other claims include that it helps improve resilience, supports low-income populations, empowers women, and strengthens communities.91011 The industry also downplays the risks of tobacco growing for health and the environment.1213
In reality, tobacco farming often leads to economic hardships, labour exploitation, environmental degradation, and health problems for farmers and communities.14
The tobacco industry uses tobacco farming as a strategy to increase tobacco consumption in a country, as well as a tool to influence policy.15 At the same time, tobacco farmers’ interests may be misrepresented through front groups set up or funded by the tobacco industry to promote its own interests.16
- For more information on tobacco industry narratives around farming see International Tobacco Growers Association

Image 1: Tobacco leaf drying (Source: Shutterstock)
The myth of economic prosperity
According to the tobacco industry, tobacco is a cash crop, which promises jobs, higher incomes for farmers and foreign direct investment for states.91011
However, tobacco growing is often less profitable for farmers than other crops, and tobacco-growing families are poorer than comparable non-tobacco-growing households.617 In Lebanon, research has shown that small scale production is so unprofitable that it would not be possible without government subsidy.18
Evidence shows that the labour costs of growing tobacco are high, as much as double the labour needed to produce other similar crops. For example, tobacco is amongst the most labour-intensive crops in Kenya, requiring over 1,000 hours of unpaid labour to produce one acre of tobacco.19 The number of hours needed for tobacco growing stops families spending time attaining educational qualifications or developing skills that might lead to more lucrative livelihoods.
In its reporting, the tobacco industry minimises the low rates of return on investment for tobacco growing and downplays the financial risks for the farmers.9 At the bottom of the tobacco supply chain, tobacco farmers are often the most exposed to fluctuations in the price of tobacco leaf.18
Contract farming
Most tobacco farmers now work under a contract system with leaf buying-companies or directly with transnational tobacco companies.1920
Under these systems, farmers receive inputs like plants, fertiliser and machinery at the start of the season from leaf-buying companies, without having to pay upfront. In return, they commit to selling their tobacco to the leaf merchant. Lower initial costs compared to other crops encourages smallholder farmers to grow tobacco, especially in lower income countries such as Malawi.21
However, leaf prices are dictated by the buying companies, which often set them very low or reduce them during the contract period. Leaf buyers often use tobacco grading (classification of leaf quality) to reduce the offer price, often in disagreement with farmers.192223 Leaf buying companies can also deduct unfairly high costs from the payment they offer farmers, to pay back the inputs they initially provided.19
Contract farming rarely produces the high returns promised by tobacco and leaf-buying companies. Instead, contract farmers remain stuck in ‘bonded labour’: debt cycles where they never earn enough to repay their debts.19202324 Contracted farmers often have to rely on the unpaid labour of family members and children in fields in order to meet contract requirements.20 A 2020 study of tobacco farming in Kenya shows that most tobacco farmers are stuck in unprofitable ‘contract farming’ systems and 10-15% are food insecure.19
Farmers often understand that this contract system for tobacco farming is risky but agree to this work because they lack the credit to pursue other economic opportunities. Contract tobacco growing guarantees them the income, however low, that they need in order to pay for basic needs like healthcare and education.6
The climate crisis and profitability
The climate crisis in tobacco-growing regions makes profits from tobacco growing more unreliable.
In Zimbabwe, shorter and more erratic rainy seasons have decreased the quality and quantity of tobacco crops, especially for smallholder farmers who cannot afford irrigation systems and rely on rainfall instead.25
In the tobacco-growing region of Temanggung, Indonesia, the phenomenon of late tobacco harvesting seasons has become increasingly common. In this region, farmers have been losing income, as companies purchase tobacco leaf from other regions where harvesting happens earlier in the year.26
Farmers in tobacco growing regions that are heavily impacted by the climate crisis have been developing adaptation and mitigation strategies to maintain the profitability of their tobacco crops, such as irrigation systems and later harvesting. However, research indicates that “even with these adaptations tobacco and maize are riskier crops to grow than traditional grains.”25
Risks of tobacco farming
Not only does tobacco farming often fail to deliver promised prosperity, tobacco growing also is associated with damage to the environment, to health and to children.
Risks to the environment
Tobacco farming has a significant impact on the environment in a number of ways, including deforestation,2728 soil degradation,2930 biodiversity loss,31 and through the use of pesticides.3233 Despite this, tobacco companies use ESG rankings and accreditations to clean up their image.34
- For more information, see the page Tobacco and the Environment

Image 2: A farmer carrying a bundle of tobacco leaf (Source: Shutterstock)
Risks to health
Tobacco leaf production has many health risks, which impact farmers, labourers and tobacco growing communities.35
According to the World Health Organization, “each day, a tobacco worker who plants, cultivates and harvests tobacco may absorb as much nicotine as found in 50 cigarettes”.5 Nicotine poisoning, also known as green tobacco sickness (GTS), occurs as a result of exposure to wet tobacco leaves during tobacco cultivation, and children are more likely to develop GTS.936 Avoiding nicotine poisoning when working with tobacco plants is difficult, even when wearing protective equipment. BAT reported several cases of GTS in its Brazilian farming operations, despite workers having worn protective equipment.9
Another risk resulting from tobacco farming is exposure to agrochemicals, including pesticides. The risk is generally lower for tobacco farmers in high-income countries than in LMICs, where the regulation of chemicals tends to be weaker.29 Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), plus eleven other persistent organic pollutants used in agrochemicals, are banned in high income countries, but not in some LMICs.2937 Pesticides are often sold to tobacco farmers in LMICs without proper packaging or instructions.2937 The health effects that derive from chronic exposure range from birth defects and tumours to blood disorders, neurological diseases and depression.2937 Even tobacco workers who do not directly mix or spray chemicals, like harvesters, can be exposed to significant levels of toxins and are susceptible to pesticide poisoning.22
In Bangladesh, where weedkiller is frequently used in tobacco fields, significant levels of chemicals were also detected in local water sources, killing fish and organisms essential for soil health.38
There is also an increased prevalence of respiratory issues, caused by tobacco dust, smoke from curing, and microorganisms (bacteria, fungi, mould, endotoxins) among tobacco farmers and workers.39
Risks to children
Child labour is a prevalent and longstanding issue in the tobacco farming sector.40
Children involved in the growing stages of tobacco farming take part in labour-intensive activities,41 which pose risks to their health,4243 and limit their access to education.4445
Children working in tobacco farms are also more vulnerable to the health risks than adults, including the impacts of absorbing nicotine.46 Many of the children working in tobacco fields in Kenya report handling fertilisers and chemicals, endangering their health.1946
Tobacco farming and the WHO FCTC
The World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) is an international treaty that aims to reduce the demand and supply of tobacco.
It recognises that as countries and governments adopt measures to reduce the demand of tobacco products, they must also address the consequences of this demand reduction on tobacco farmers who rely on these crops for their livelihoods.47
Article 17
Article 17 of the FCTC recognises the need to:
“promote economically viable alternatives to tobacco production as a way to prevent possible adverse social and economic impacts on populations whose livelihoods depend on tobacco production.”1
Alternative crops or ventures can provide tobacco farmers more sustainable livelihoods.48 However, a lack of government support and resistance from the tobacco industry has meant mixed results with regard to crop diversification.4950
The tobacco industry has been involved in programmes supporting farming diversification in tobacco growing regions, despite the WHO FCTC specifically recommending that “policies promoting economically sustainable alternative livelihoods should be protected from commercial and other vested interests of the tobacco industry”.114 A study in Malawi by the Sustainable Development Initiative in collaboration with STOP found tobacco industry efforts at diversification to be “largely superficial and counterproductive”.51 It claimed their initiatives were ineffective, contradictory, and were a tool aimed at improving the industry’s image, rather than a genuine commitment to diversification.
Article 18
Under Article 18, Parties to the FCTC must also:
“have due regard to the protection of the environment and the health of persons in relation to the environment in respect of tobacco cultivation and manufacture within their respective territories.”47
- For more information see the page on Tobacco and the Environment
CSR and ESG
In response to increasing scrutiny over environmental degradation and the use of child labour in the tobacco supply chain, transnational tobacco companies have invested in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives. They promote these in the media and through their Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) reports.34
In tobacco growing countries, CSR initiatives are a useful tool for the tobacco industry to project a positive image and further their interests.52 However, such initiatives have been criticised for being ineffective,53 as well as for inaccurate and unreliable reporting.54
- For more information, see the pages on CSR: Child Labour, and the Eliminating Child Labour in Tobacco-Growing (ECLT) foundation
PMI’s ‘Agricultural Labour Practices’ (ALP) Programme
On 10 December 2020, Philip Morris International (PMI) published an article seeking to celebrate the International Day of Human Rights by promoting its achievements around its Agricultural Labour Practices (ALP) program. This programme was created by PMI in 2011, seemingly aiming to end child labour and protect workers’ rights and livelihoods.55
According PMI’s ALP 2020 report, the key principles of the programme include “no child labor”, “no forced labor and human trafficking”, “safe work environment”, “freedom of association”, and “terms of employment”.56 However, the timeline below (Image 3) from the same report shows how PMI continued to use child labour in its supply chain, despite the programme having run for nine years. The company gave itself a further five years to end the practice.5657

Image 3: Timeline of the ‘Agricultural Labor Practices Program’ (Source: Philip Morris International, ALP program 2020 report)56
- For more information on PMI’s ALP programme, and how tobacco companies fail to properly measure or manage the effectiveness of this type of initiative, see CSR: Child Labour
Tobacco Tactics Resources
Relevant Links
- How does Big Tobacco treat tobacco farmers? TCRG podcast, September 2025
- Supplying the deadly tobacco industry, F. Dunwoodie Stirton, TCRG blog, May 2023
- Five facts about Tobacco Farming, TCRG blog, May 2023
- World No Tobacco Day 2023: Grow food, not tobacco, World Health Organization
- Tobacco growing: myth buster, World Health Organization
- Tobacco and its environmental impact: an overview, World Health Organization
- Unfairtobacco, Berlin Working Group on Environment and Development
- The Tobacco Atlas
TCRG Research
- Independent companies in the tobacco supply chain: transparency and environmental social governance, F. Dunwoodie Stirton, R. Hiscock, J. Mehegan et al, Tobacco Control Published Online First: 08 January 2025, doi: 10.1136/tc-2024-058978
For a comprehensive list of all TCRG publications, including TCRG research that evaluates the impact of public health policy, go to the Bath TCRG’s list of publications.