Consumer Choice Center

This page was last edited on at

The Consumer Choice Center (CCC) is a US lobby organisation based in Washington DC. It was set up as not-for-profit in February 2017, and approved for tax exempt status in 2019, on the basis of it being a social welfare organisation.1 It has offices in the United States, Canada and the European Union (EU).2 As of March 2022 it had not filed any financial returns with the US authorities.1

CCC has stated that it lobbies against “paternalistic” government regulations,3 covering “food and agriculture policies, fat/sugar tax, soda tax, food labelling, health care and harm reduction, trade initiatives (TTIP/TTP), transportation and aviation regulations”.4 It describes itself as a “consumer advocacy group” and a “grassroots movement”5 which “represents consumers in over 100 countries”.6

It has lobbied against the regulation of tobacco products in the EU and other countries, including against plain packaging. In May 2020 CCC set up the World Vapers’ Alliance (WVA), which lobbies for the promotion of e-cigarettes and against their regulation.7

Background

CCC’s parent organisation is Students For Liberty (SFL),8 an American libertarian organisation linked to billionaires Charles and David Koch and partner of the Atlas Network.910 CCC was listed as a partner of the Atlas Network in its 2018 Annual Report.11

In 2017, SFL launched CCC with a budget of  $210,296.12 CCC describes itself as “totally open” to corporate donations.13

On the EU transparency register, CCC declared total income of close to €7.8 million in its first two years of operation, in the form of donations from unspecified sources.1415 In 2019 this fell to around €1,000,000.1617 Its declaration for 2021, published in March 2022, declared no funding.4

The organisation states that it has received financial support from consumer goods, energy, manufacturing, digital, healthcare, cryptocurrency and fin-tech industries.18 It has also received funding from the Atlas Network (and associated company the Atlas Project), the Geneva Network,19 and directly from transnational tobacco companies (see below).620 An investigation by Le Monde and The Investigative Desk revealed that CCC received a EU€14,000 grant from the Atlas Network in 2018.21 According to CCC’s own code of ethics, published on its website, its “campaigns, op-eds, and videos are not sent to supporters before they are released. Partners see our content and outputs at the same time as the general public.”6 It does not detail what other input any supporters might have up to the point of release.

Staff

CCC’s Managing Director is Frederik Roeder.2223 Prior to working for CCC, Roeder worked for SFL where he co-founded their European Branch.21

Other persons that work for, or have previously worked for the CCC:

  • Adam Cleave, Senior Adviser (previously worked for Imperial Tobacco)2425
  • Jeff Stier, Senior Fellow, tobacco harm reduction advocate2627
  • Bill Wirtz, Policy Analyst
  • Luca Bertoletti, European Affairs Manager
  • Yaël Ossowski, Deputy Director23
  • Maria Chaplia, Research Manager

Many CCC staff have previously held, or currently hold, roles within SFL.2823

Roeder, Bertoletti and Chaplia were registered EU lobbyists in 2017/18.15 Bertolleti is also a Director of a public relations company called B&K Agency.29

LATAM Policy Fellow Antonella Marty is the Associate Director of the Center for Latin America at Atlas Network.2330 As of March 2022, CCC also had Policy Fellows for South Africa, Nigeria, Taiwan and Indonesia.23

Connections with Governments

Peter Liese, a Member of the European Parliament (MEP), collaborates with the World Vapers’ Alliance.3132 In 2022, CCC’s website stated that it was the ‘secretariat’ for a cross party group in the EU Parliament called “Innovation, Brands, and IP – The future of Europe group”, also referred to as “MEPS4Innovation”.3133 Claiming over 30 members “representing most EU states”, its work areas were listed as: “Digital; Healthcare; Agriculture; Harm Reduction; Consumer Goods” (all of potential interest to tobacco companies).33 Despite claims to and the use of the EU Parliament logo on its webpage, this group was not on the list of parliamentary ‘intergroups’ and appeared to have no official role.3134

In January 2022, Lord Wharton joined CCC as a Strategic Adviser.2335 James Lord Wharton is a member of the UK House of Lords, was previously an adviser to Boris Johnson and, as of 2022, is Chair of the Office for Students. He lists CCC as one of his Directorships on the UK Government register of interests.36

At the same time, Alexander Kvitashvili joined CCC as Public Health Advisor. An independent consultant to the World Health Organization, Kvitashvili was Minister of Healthcare of Ukraine (to 2016), and prior to that Minister of Health of Georgia.2335

Relationship with the Tobacco Industry

CCC has received funding from Japan Tobacco International (JTI), who co-funded its launch event,1837 JTI was a member of CCC in 2017.38396 Upon request, JTI declined to disclose what this membership entailed and how much financial support was linked to it.40

In addition, Roeder contributed to “Regulating Consumers?”, a Euractiv Special Report sponsored by JTI for €10,000.4142

In 2018, CCC stated that it had received funding from Philip Morris International.18

Altria has donated an unspecified amount of money to CCC annually from 2018.43444546

CCC has received funding from British American Tobacco (BAT) since 2019, in support of CCC’s “tobacco harm reduction advocacy”.621

See below for CCC’s outputs relating to e-cigarettes and harm reduction.

Attempt to Discredit World Health Organisation (WHO) and IARC

In September 2018, in the run up to the meeting of the 8th Conference of the Parties (COP 8) of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), CCC scheduled three strongly biased roundtables to discuss “WHO’s shortcomings in working towards better global public health and how the WHO actively blocks healthier technologies in the area of harm reduction”.47 The events also condemned the WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) assessment of the pesticide glyphosate as a probable human carcinogen. None of the invited speakers had public health qualifications.

London, 6 September 2018

Scheduled presentations at the London roundtable included:47

  • Bill Wirtz, CCC: “Too busy with the wrong Priorities: Does the WHO suffer from Mission Creep?”
  • Frederick Roeder, CCC: “Foreign Aid for Public Health and Clandestine Maneuvering: Insights from the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control”
  • Christopher Snowdon, Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA): “Public Funding of Public Health Activists”
  • Daniel Pryor, Adam Smith Institute “How the UK can become a leader in tobacco harm reduction”

Brussels, 10 September 2018

At the Brussels roundtable, the following presentations were on the agenda:48

  • Bill Wirtz, CCC: “Too busy with the wrong Priorities: Does the WHO suffer from Mission Creep?”
  • Frederick Roeder, CCC: “Foreign Aid for Public Health and Clandestine Maneuvering sic: Insights from the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control”
  • “The WHO and The International Agency for Research and Cancer (IARC): How evidence based policies are sabotaged by those who ought enforce them”, by Professor David Zaruk, Odisee University College

Rome, 18 September 2018

The focus of the roundtable in Italy seemed to be on E-cigarettes and the product’s future in Italy. Listed external speakers were:

  • Carolina Pellegrini (Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano)
  • Daniele Capezzone (New Direction Italia)
  • Alessandro Colucci (Camera dei Deputati)

Lobbying for Newer Nicotine and Tobacco Products

Research with Twitter data by Bath TCRG highlighted the nature of CCC’s activity around meeting of the 8th Conference of the Parties (COP 8), and those of other tobacco industry allies.49

The researchers concluded that:

The nature of the activity on Twitter around COP8, including a substantial online presence by PMI executives and NGP [Next Generation Products, also referred to as newer nicotine and tobacco products] advocates with links to organisations funded directly and indirectly by PMI, is highly consistent with PMI’s 2014 corporate affairs strategy, which described engaging tobacco harm reduction advocates to ‘amplify and leverage the debate on harm reduction’ around events such as the COP.49

After this CCC continued to direct its lobbying efforts to the promotion of e-cigarettes, which it frames as “harm reduction advocacy”. It became more active from 2020, in the run up to COP 9, when it received further funding from BAT.

2018: COP 8

During the meeting of the 8th Conference of the Parties (COP) of the WHO FCTC in October 2018, the CCC organised the “Nicotine is Not Your Enemy Soirée”. The event advertisement criticised the WHO for “condemning nicotine” and refusing to “support harm reduction” and stated its “hope to convince delegates of COP8 to join us and learn more about harm reduction”.50 Professor Bernd Mayer, who sits on the World Vapers’ Alliance’s advisory board, spoke at the event which also included “live demonstrations of harm-reducing technologies.”505152

CCC Director Roeder and Co-Director Ossowski registered as journalists at COP 8, citing their contributions to libertarian news sites, which gave them access to the events sessions. However, their press badges were later suspended for “misrepresentation.”2152

This lobbying continued after COP 8 and in the run-up to COP 9.

2020

In June 2020, CCC called for the “liberalisation of vaping”.53 It also put out a statement arguing that the US State of Georgia’s proposed tax on e-cigarettes would “harm poor consumers”.54 CCC also lobbied politicians in Alaska to reject a proposed e-cigarette tax.55

In September 2020, CCC published a report called “Why Vape Flavors Matter”, co-written with the WVA. The report argued against proposals to ban e-cigarette flavours in the US and EU.56 CCC also lobbied against proposed flavour bans in California, Connecticut and Maine.575859

In October 2020, CCC published a report called “Vaping and the Gateway Myth”, also co-written with the WVA6061 It also recommended that e-cigarette advertising should be allowed.60

Neither report stated that CCC receives tobacco industry funding.

2021: COP 9

CCC submitted evidence to the UK All-Party Parliamentary Group for Vapings COP 9 inquiry. The submission said the UK should object to the FCTC’s e-cigarette treaty proposals and instead “champion… harm-reducing technologies such as vaping.” Adding: “with the United Kingdom’s influence, the FCTC could once more achieve its purpose of reducing tobacco consumption around the world.”62

In October 2021, a month before COP 9, CCC co-signed a letter “calling on the Biden administration’s WHO delegation to recognise the value of tobacco harm reduction.” The letter said the WHO pursued “quit or die” policies that “keep people using cigarettes.”63

The World Vapers’ Alliance (WVA) launched in May 2020, initially presented as an independent partner organisation of CCC.64 WVA later acknowledged it had been established by CCC.65 It is linked to Red Flag Consulting a lobbying company which has BAT and CCC as clients.

Investigations by Le Monde and The Investigative Desk showed that WVA was actively lobbying against the regulation of e-cigarettes before and during COP 9, in November 2021.21 Videos on the WVA YouTube channel depicted the organisation’s activities, including its “Back Vaping Beat Smoking” branded campaign van and its presence in Geneva (although COP was held virtually due to the Covid-19 pandemic).66

2022

In January 2022, Ossowski wrote an article for CCC’s website, blaming “the public health lobby” for a rise in smoking rates.67 David Clement, CCC’s North American Affairs Manager, wrote an op-ed in the Financial Post in June 2022 that argued “heavy-handed vaping regulations and taxation do nothing but create more smokers”.2368

Lobbying against proposed US menthol ban

Seminar organised by Americans for Tax Reform

In May 2022, Ossowski took part in a virtual seminar, titled “The Devastating Impact of the FDA’s Proposed Menthol & Flavored Cigar Ban”, convened by the Americans for Tax Reform (ATR).69 All but one of the panellists represented organisations which have accepted tobacco industry funding:

  • Tim Andrews represented ATR, which has accepted money from RJ Reynolds (a subsidiary of BAT), Altria, JTI and BAT. 43444670
  • Guy Bentley represented The Reason Foundation, which has accepted money from Altria and is an Atlas Network partner94344454670
  • Major Neill Franklin, represented the Law Enforcement Action Partnership, which in 2019 received more than a third of its funding from RJ Reynolds American.71 It has also accepted money from Altria.43444546
  • Lindsey Stroud represented the Taxpayers Protection Alliance (TPA), which does not reveal its funding sources. TPA is an Atlas Network21Stroud worked for the Heritage Foundation from 2016 to 2020, which has received funding from Altria.7072

CCC Session: “FDA’s Menthol Melee”

In June 2022 CCC hosted a session called “the Menthol Melee” which was chaired by Ossowski.73 The session included contributions from former law enforcement officers and Micheal Landl (Director of the World Vapers’ Alliance), Jeff Stier (Senior Fellow at CCC and Taxpayers Protection Alliance) and Dr Prritika Kumar (Senior Fellow at R Street Institute).

The speakers argued banning menthol cigarettes would incentivise the illicit tobacco trade and bring police departments into further conflict with black communities. The latter of these arguments is the same used by RJ Reynolds consultants.71

Lobbying on illicit trade around MOP 2

CCC also lobbies on illicit trade, including the illicit trade of tobacco products.74 In a July 2020 EU policy paper, “Illicit Trade is Dangerous for Consumers”, CCC argued that to prevent the illicit trade of tobacco products, plain packaging should be rejected, taxes should be limited and there should be no further restrictions on their marketing and advertisement.75

In November 2021, around the time of the second meeting of the Members of the Parties (MOP 2) to the Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products, CCC organised a webinar on the topic.7677 This was introduced by the Irish MEP Sean Kelly. Although CCC promoted this as a live event, Mr Kelly’s statement was pre-recorded and he did not take part in the discussion.76 The other speakers were from a Spanish business forum and a UK based brand consultancy.77

CCC submitted a response to the EU consultation on tobacco taxation in 2021, citing the risk of illicit trade 78 Its submission stated that:

“Smoking should be seen as a matter of consumer choice and personal responsibility. Tobacco products should not see any further scrutiny”.78

Citing concern over illicit trade is a well-documented industry argument against taxation.

Opposing intellectual property wavier on COVID 19 vaccines

CCC has opposed attempts by the World Trade Organisation (WTO) to improve access to COVID-19 vaccines. WTO has considered temporarily waiving intellectual property rights relating to the prevention, containment or treatment of COVID-19, which would allow WTO member countries to manufacture COVID-19 vaccines to cope with demands.79 CCC published an article in May 2021 criticising President Biden’s support of the waiver,80 and another in June 2022 arguing that the “TRIPS waiver will cost us decades of progress”.81 CCC has also advocated for Germany and Canada to oppose the waiver,8283 and appears to have attempted to influence Members of the European Parliament on the subject, predominantly through its “Innovation, Brands and Intellectual Property- The Future of Europe” group.84

Tobacco companies that are financially linked to CCC have significant investments in COVID-19 vaccine development. BAT announced in April 2020 that its subsidiary, Kentucky BioProcessing, is developing a COVID 19 vaccine, and has since launched a new company, KBio Holdings Limited, to accelerate this development.85 Philip Morris International is a major shareholder in Medicago, a Canadian biotechnology company whose COVID 19 vaccine was approved for use in Canada in February 2022.86

The tobacco industry has a history of using intellectual property arguments to oppose new tobacco control regulations, such as the introduction of plain packaging and graphic health warnings.87

Lobbying against plain packaging

CCC called on EU policymakers to reject plain packing in a July 2020 policy paper, arguing that it “increased the presence of illicit tobacco in all the countries which implemented it.”74

In March 2021, CCC made a submission to the UK Governments consultation on the Tobacco and Related Products Regulations 2016 and the Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products Regulations 2015. CCC argued “tobacco products should not see any further scrutiny”, that plain packaging “hasn’t proved to be effective” and nor have health warning labels “in helping smokers quit”.88

CCC also argued that “further bans of vaping products will drive more consumers to illegal products on the unregulated black market, where there is no guarantee of safety or quality. A larger black market will make it even easier for minors to purchase vaping products with no age verifications at all.”88

Opposed tobacco endgame

CCC has lobbied against proposed tobacco endgame policies in the UK.89 For details see Tobacco Industry Interference with Endgame Policies. 

Other Affiliations

  • In addition to being scheduled to speak at the anti-WHO event, the IEA was involved in launching the CCC in April 2017. Christopher Snowdon, the IEA’s “Head of Lifestyle Economics”, featured in the promotional video for the CCC’s launch event.90
  • At its launch event, the CCC disclosed that it “collaborated with” EPICENTER, a free-market think tank collective, set up and funded by the IEA.91
  • CCC was represented by Jeff Stier at the launch of Forest EU, a tobacco industry-funded pro-smoking group.92

Relevant Links

TobaccoTactics Resources

TCRG Research

Exploring the Twitter activity around the eighth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, L. Robertson, A. Joshi, T. Legg et al, Tobacco Control, 11 November 2020, doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-055889

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

References

  1. ↑abUS Internal Revenue Service, Consumer Choice Center: EIN: 84-2358602, register entry, accessed March 2022
  2. ↑Consumer Choice Center, FAQ, 2018, accessed July 2019
  3. ↑Consumer Choice Center, About us, undated, accessed July 2019
  4. ↑abConsumer Choice Center, EU Transparency Register Entry, 7 March 2022, accessed March 2022
  5. ↑Consumer Choice Center, The Global Grassroots Movement for Consumer Choice, CCC website, accessed July 2019
  6. ↑abcdeConsumer Choice Center, FAQs, website, accessed March 2022
  7. ↑B.Kenber, Revealed: how tobacco giants are bankrolling secret pro-vaping campaign, The Times, 14 December 2023, accessed December 2023
  8. ↑Consumer Choice Center, About Us, website, archived November 2018, accessed March 2022
  9. ↑abAtlas Network, Global Directory, website, undated, archived 5 August 2021, accessed September 2022
  10. ↑Corporate Europe Observatory, Big Tobacco and right-wing US billionaires funding anti-regulation hardliners in the EU, 20 July 2017, accessed July 2019
  11. ↑Atlas Network, Annual Report 2018, accessed July 2019
  12. ↑Students For Liberty, 2017 Annual Report, available from www.studentsforliberty.org, 2017 (undated), accessed March 2018
  13. ↑H. Cooper, Q. Ariès, POLITICO Brussels Influence: Consumers for liberty — EU breaches justice rules, POLITICO, 24 March 2017, accessed July 2019
  14. ↑Consumer Choice Center, EU Transparency Register Entry, 10 January 2018, accessed February 2018
  15. ↑abConsumer Choice Center, EU Transparency Register Entry, 31 December 2018, archived August 2019, accessed March 2020
  16. ↑Consumer Choice Center, EU Transparency Register Entry, 29 April 2020, accessed October 2020
  17. ↑Consumer Choice Center, EU Transparency Register Entry, 20 April 2021, archived November 2021, accessed March 2022
  18. ↑abcConsumer Choice Center, Frequently Asked Questions, undated, archived 13 June 2018, accessed January 2020
  19. ↑The Geneva Network, Open Corporates, accessed March 2022
  20. ↑Consumer Choice Center, About Us, undated, accessed October 2020
  21. ↑abcdefS. Horel, The Vapour Trail, Le Monde, 3 November 2021, accessed March 2022
  22. ↑F. Roeder, LinkedIn profile, accessed January 2018
  23. ↑abcdefghConsumer Choice Center, Meet the Team, website, undated, accessed September 2022
  24. ↑A. Cleave, LinkedIn Profile, undated, accessed January 2018
  25. ↑Consumer Choice Center Adam Cleave, accessed July 2019
  26. ↑Consumer Choice Center Jeff Stier, undated, accessed July 2019
  27. ↑Tobacco Reporter, Stier joins consumer body, 9 January 2018, accessed July 2019
  28. ↑Consumer Choice Center Staff, undated, accessed July 2019
  29. ↑B&K Agency,  LinkedIn profile, undated, accessed March 2022
  30. ↑Atlas Network, Our People: Antonella Marty, undated, accessed April 2022
  31. ↑abcR. Sollenberger, W. Bredderman, Guess Who’s Secretly Backing This ‘Anti-Smoking’ Vape Group, Daily Beast, 9 January 2022, accessed March 2022
  32. ↑Vape TV/World Vapers’ Alliance, Politicians Talk Vaping Ep.1 – Peter Liese, MEP, published on youtube.com, 22 July 2021, accessed March 2022
  33. ↑abConsumer Choice Center, Innovations, Brands and IP: The Future of Europe, website, undated, accessed March 2022
  34. ↑European Parliament, European Parliament Intergroups, website, undated, accessed March 2022
  35. ↑abConsumer Choice Center, The CCC Welcomes Lord Wharton and Alexander Kvitashvili as Advisors, press release, 18 January 2022, accessed March 2022
  36. ↑UK Parliament, Lord Wharton of Yarm, website, accessed March 2022
  37. ↑Y. Ossowski, Email to Corporate Europe Observatory, Consumer Choice Center, 22 June 2017, archived 21 February 2018, accessed December 2020
  38. ↑EU Transparency Register, Japan Tobacco International Entry, 16 November 2017, accessed July 2019
  39. ↑Japan Tobacco International, lobbyfacts.eu, register entry, 2017 register entry, accessed December 2020
  40. ↑Japan Tobacco International, Email reply to Tobacco Control Research Group, Subject: Re: REF GB-18-01469/NCC/TRM, 26 February 2018 08:48
  41. ↑F. Roeder Weighing the tradeoffs of joy versus long term health, Euractiv, 19 June 2017, accessed July 2019
  42. ↑Euractiv, Email reply to Tobacco Control Research Group, Subject: Re: General inquiry – Message From the Team Page, 27 April 2018, 12:01
  43. ↑abcdAltria, 2018 Recipients of Charitable Contributions from the Altria Family of Companies, archived 20 March 2020, accessed December 2020
  44. ↑abcdAltria, 2019 Recipients of Charitable Contributions from the Altria Family of Companies, archived 20 march 2020, accessed March 2022
  45. ↑abcAltria, 2020  Recipients of Charitable Contributions from the Altria Family of Companies, archived 19 May 2021, accessed March 2022
  46. ↑abcdAltria, 2021 Recipients of Charitable Contributions from the Altria Family of Companies, accessed March 2022
  47. ↑abConsumer Choice Center, Does the WHO act in the interest of Global Public Health? -London 6 September, 2018, accessed July 2019
  48. ↑Consumer Choice Center, Does the WHO act in the interest of Global Public Health? -Brussels 10 September, 2018, accessed July 2019
  49. ↑abL. Robertson, A. Joshi, T. Legg et al, Exploring the Twitter activity around the eighth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, Tobacco Control, 11 November 2020, doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-055889
  50. ↑abConsumer Choice Center, Nicotine is Not Your Enemy Soirée, website, undated, archived January 2019, accessed September 2022
  51. ↑World Vapers Alliance, About us, website, undated, accessed September 2022
  52. ↑abS. Kaplan, Flashy Science Hub and Vaping Parties Fail to Win Friends at W.H.O. Tobacco Talks, The New York Times, 7 October 2018, accessed September 2022
  53. ↑Consumer Group Urges Liberal Tobacco Policies, Tobacco Reporter, 1 June 2020, accessed October 2020
  54. ↑Consumer Choice Center, Georgia’s Proposed Vape and Nicotine Tax Will Hurt Poor Consumers, 25 June 2020, accessed October 2020
  55. ↑Consumer Choice Center, Elizabeth Hicks testifies at the Alaska State Legislature on the Proposed 75% Vaping Tax, published on youtube.com, 3 February 2022, accessed September 2022
  56. ↑Consumer Choice Center, Why Vape Flavors Matter, website, undated, accessed September 2022
  57. ↑Regulator Watch, California Asked to Repeal Flavor Ban, website, 16 November 2020, accessed September 2022
  58. ↑Consumer Choice Center, Elizabeth Hicks testifies at the Connecticut General Assembly on the Proposed Vaping Flavor Ban, published on youtube.com, 14 March 2022, accessed September 2022
  59. ↑Consumer Choice Center, Yaël Ossowski testifies at the Maine State Legislature on the Proposed Vaping Flavor Ban, published on youtube.com, 9 February 2022, accessed September 2022
  60. ↑abConsumer Choice Center, Vaping and the Gateway Myth, website, undated, accessed October 2020
  61. ↑M. Chaplia, M. Landl, Vaping and the Gateway Myth, report by CCC and World Vapers’ Alliance, October 2020, accessed October 2020
  62. ↑Consumer Choice Center, (APPG COP9) Framework Convention for Tobacco Control (FCTC), website, 8 February 2021, accessed September 2022
  63. ↑Consumer Choice Center, Consumer Choice Center Joins Coalition Calling on the Biden Administration’s WHO Delegation to Recognise the Value of Tobacco Harm Reduction, website, 29 October 2021, accessed September 2022
  64. ↑World Vapers’ Alliance, About Us, website, undated, accessed October 2020
  65. ↑World Vapers’ Alliance, About us, website, undated, archived September 2020, accessed March 2022
  66. ↑Vape TV/World Vapers Alliance, YouTube Channel, published on youtube.com, accessed March 2022
  67. ↑Consumer Choice Center, Smoking is up for the first time in a generation. The public health lobby is to blame, website, 13 January 2022, accessed September 2022
  68. ↑D. Clement, Opinion: Taxing vaping promotes smoking. So why is Ottawa doing that, Financial Post, 15 June 2022, archived June 2022, accessed September 2022
  69. ↑Consumer Choice Center, The Devestating Impact of the FDA’s Proposed Menthol & Flavored Cigarette Ban, website, 9 May 2022, accessed September 2022
  70. ↑abcFree-market groups and the tobacco industry – full database, Guardian, 23 January 2019, archived July 2019, accessed September 2022
  71. ↑abB. Stockton, E. Baumgaertner, R. Lindsay, Paid protesters, free lunches and backroom chats: Inside the menthol lobbying machine, The Bureau of Investigative Journalism, 25 April 2022, accessed September 2022
  72. ↑Lindsey Stroud, LinkedIn profile, accessed September 2022
  73. ↑Consumer Choice Center, Consumer Choice Center’s FDA Menthol Melee, published on youtube.com, 21 June 2022, accessed September 2022
  74. ↑abConsumer Choice Center, Illicit Trade, website, undated, archived October 2021, accessed March 2022
  75. ↑Consumer Choice Center, Illicit Trade is Dangerous for Consumers, policy paper, website, July 2020, accessed March 2022
  76. ↑abConsumer Choice Center, Illicit Trade: Challenges and Solutions, youtube, 10 November 2021, accessed March 2022
  77. ↑abConsumer Choice Center, Illicit Trade: Challenges and Solutions, website, 15 November 2021, accessed March 2022
  78. ↑abConsumer Choice Center, Tobacco taxation – excise duties for manufactured tobacco products, consultation submission, 21 June 2021, accessed March 2022
  79. ↑World Trade Organisation, TRIPS Council to continue to discuss temporary IP waiver, revised proposal expected in May, World Trade Organisation 2021 News, website, 30 April 2021, accessed June 2022
  80. ↑Consumer Choice Center, Biden’s support for seizing vaccine IP harms innovation, Consumer Choice Center website, May 2021, accessed June 2022
  81. ↑Consumer Choice Center, Trips waiver will cost us decades of progress, Consumer Choice Center website, June 2022, accessed June 2022
  82. ↑Consumer Choice Center, Canada under pressure to support waiver lifting patents on Covid-19 vaccines, Consumer Choice Center website, May 2021, accessed June 2022
  83. ↑A. Green, How Germany’s new coalition could change the fate of the TRIPs waiver, Devex, 22 November, accessed June 2022
  84. ↑S. Lazare, Big tobacco is funding opposition to global covid vaccine access, In These Times, June 2022, accessed June 2022
  85. ↑British American Tobacco, BAT creates biotech company KBio to accelerate development of existing plant-based technology, Press Release, BAT website, January 2022, accessed June 2022
  86. ↑STOP, Philip Morris International and Medicago’s COVID-19 vaccine, Industry Brief, March 2022, accessed June 2022
  87. ↑S. Zhou, Intellectual property arguments in tobacco industry legal challenges: lessons from recently concluded cases, Tobacco Induced Diseases, 2018;16(Suppl 1):A52, doi:10.18332/tid/83914
  88. ↑abConsumer Choice Center, (UK) A consultation on the Tobacco and Related Products Regulations 2016 and the Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products Regulations 2015, website, 19 March 2021, accessed September 2022
  89. ↑Consumer Choice Center, No2Prohibition, website, undated, accessed December 2023
  90. ↑Consumer Choice Center, Launch of the Consumer Choice Center 16 April 2017, YouTube video footage, published on 2 May 2017, accessed July 2019
  91. ↑M. Hope, Lobby Group Tied to Koch Brothers, Brexit Climate Deniers Pushes ‘Strong Pro-Corporate Agenda’, Ecowatch, 20 July 2017, accessed July 2019
  92. ↑S. Clark, Forest EU launch party, Taking Liberties blog, 2 June 2017, accessed July 2019

Categories